Introduction
One of the most important diseases affecting the perianal region is perianal fistula. The incidence of this disease in the population is 2%, and it is three times more common in men than in women. The typical features are that it has a chronic course, the rate of spontaneous remission is very low, recurrence is common, and it usually requires at least one surgical intervention.1 It should not be forgotten that apart from the emotional and physical distress caused, perianal fistula also leads to severe loss working capability and the diagnosis and treatment may be costly. Perianal fistula may be divided into two groups; complex and non-complex fistulas with complex fistula being more challenging for clinical management. The delay in the diagnosis of a complex fistula, which includes horseshoe fistula, or the inability to perform optimal surgery as a result of inadequate preoperative evaluation, may result in the development of sepsis, incontinence secondary to progressive destruction, and eventually permanent stoma. In the classical approach, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation is considered superior to other methods because MRI can provide optimal quality images and sufficient information for the evaluation of pelvic floor anatomy in the diagnosis of perianal fistula. However, MRI is not available everywhere, it can be costly and interpretation is dependent of the experience of the radiologist. Especially in high-volume centers, the delay between the MRI scan and the operation date may causs the patient to be operated without adequate evaluation of disease progression or inadequate identification and assessment of any newly developed complication. In modern practice, physical examination is recommended for the diagnosis of noncomplex fistulas and no other method is necessary.2 In complex, recurrent or Crohn-related fistulas, endoanal ultrasonography (USG) is currently preferred because of the low cost and ease of application before surgery. In this video presentation, the aim was to share the endoanal USG image of a horseshoe fistula tract following the injection of oxygenated water with an intraket in a 34-year-old male patient with a nine-year history of Crohn disease who was actively using azathioprine and infliximab.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient. After sedoanalgesia, the patient was placed in the lithotomy position. The external mouth of the fistula at the 7 o’clock position was visualized from 3 cm distal to the ancutaneous line. Since the inner mouth could not be visualized clearly during anal exploration, it was decided to perform endoanal USG. The patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position. An endoanal USG probe (Anorectal 3D 2052, BK Medical) with a frequency of 16-6 MHz was placed in the anal canal. Oxygenated water was introduced into the tract through an intraket. The fistula tract was detected by USG and the procedure was terminated.
In conclusion, this presentation has demonstrated that an endoanal USG examination may be performed before surgery on the operating table and is a cheap, easily applicable and effective method. This can be used to ensure provision optimal treatment for patients with complex or recurrent perianal fistula.
*This video presentation was recorded at the proctology course held at University of Health Sciences Turkey Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital on 17.10.2020.
Ethics
Informed Consent: Obtained.
Peer-review: Externally peer reviewed.
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: M.İ.P., İ.T., Concept: M.İ.P., Design: A.T., Data Collection or Processing: M.K.Y., Analysis or Interpretation: A.T., Literature Search: M.K.Y., İ.T., Writing: M.K.Y., A.T.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.